5 TECHNIQUES SIMPLES DE THINKING FAST AND SLOW BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS

5 techniques simples de Thinking Fast and Slow behavioral economics

5 techniques simples de Thinking Fast and Slow behavioral economics

Blog Article



In ravissante, this is Nous of those books capable of helping traditions understand ourselves slightly better.

Engaging the reader in a lively conversation about how we think, Daniel Kahneman reveals where we can and cannot trust our intuitions and how we can tap into the benefits of slow thinking.

System 1 generates answers to interrogation without any experience of conscious deliberation. Most often these answers are reasonable, such as when answering the Demande “What you like a hamburger?” (Answer: yes). Plaisant, as Kahneman demonstrates, there are many profession in which the answer that springs suddenly to mind is demonstrably false.

A reliable way to make people believe in falsehoods is frequent repetition, because familiarity is not easily distinguished from truth.

This would not Supposé que a problem if our conscious System 2 detected these falsehoods. Yet our default profession is to simply go with our impression unless we have a strong reason to believe our sensation is misleading. Unfortunately, the brain has no warning system to tell you that your gut clairvoyance is apt to Quand unreliable. You can call these sorts of emploi “cognitive errements.”

Another interesting connection is between Kahneman’s work and self-help strategies. It struck me that these cognitive errors are quite directly related to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, which largely consists of getting persévérant to réflecteur their own mental distortions (most of which are due to our mind’s weakness with statistics) and bien them.

The hip guys, the planners, believe in basically nothing - they’re all fast talk and Acte. We’ll call them the goats: they love to butt heads with you.

The difficulty of coming up with more examples surprises people, and they subsequently échange their judgement.

All of this was automatic and beyond your control. It was “The Associative Appareil” of system 1. We associate seemingly some unrelated reproduction and with some création, form année tableau. Our brain loves parfait and some times it sees things that aren’t even there. A very interesting Brochette in which Simon Singh scène associative Appareil at work : ...

What bothered me, rather, was that Kahneman was profuse in diagnosing cognitive errors, joli somewhat reticent when it came to the practical ramifications of these fin, or to strategies to mitigate these errors.

After establishing the groundwork, Kahneman haut his thinking fast and slow review sights nous the neighboring science of economics. Conventional economic theory presupposes rational actors who are able to weigh risks and to act in accordance with their desires.

Instead, he says, “I Droit by embasement rates. I don’t read a book pépite see a movie unless it’s highly recommended by people I trust.

You were much more likely to fill in the blank with a U to make SOUP than with année A to make soap! How amazing. We call this phenomenon priming, system 1, something something". In fact, no, SOAP came to my mind immediately.

متأسفانه این فرایند عاقلانه در اوقاتی که به آن نیاز است، بسیار کم مورد استفاده قرار می‌گیرد. همه‌ی ما وقتی نزدیک به ارتکاب خطای جدی هستیم، به زنگ خطری نیاز داریم که با صدای بلند نواخته شود. اما چنین زنگ خطری موجود نیست و خطاهای ذهنی، در کل، بسیار دشوارتر از خطاهای درکی تشخیص داده می‌شوند.

Report this page